Monday, August 31, 2009
Film is dead, long live film:
If you weren't there you missed a great discussion about all things editing. I have one juicy tidbit to share - especially for my Gowlandflex, Type 55 followers. After all, that big, beautiful, beast of a camera was the reason I started this blog. Here goes: Wired, the magazine of the digerati, prefers film. Yep you heard it here. They not only are okay with photographers shooting film on assignment but prefer and encourage it. Joe Pugliese, Todd Hido, Dan Winters - all shoot film for Wired. So dust off your 4x5 holders and unplug yourself for a minute. Film isn't dead.
Meanwhile you can read about and see photos from a Dan Winters shoot with Brad Pitt - on 4x5 - for Wired here on WTJ.
If you are lucky enough to be in San Francisco on September 23 2009, APA is hosting a lecture by Dan Winters about his new book Periodical Photographs, Aperture press 2009 at AAU. Details coming soon on the APAsf.com website.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Transparency and the photo biz
Transparency is one of the theoretical conditions required for a free market be efficient. - Wikipedia
In case you've missed it there is an interesting conversation going on on A Photo Editor. APE posted some advertising and editorial estimates. Read the comments if you want to see ensuing debate about pricing. I want to thank him for posting these and for the debate he started. There were 154 comments as of this morning. In many ways APE is doing for the industry what our professional organizations believe they cannot do - openly discuss the cost and value of photography.
I think there is a very interesting lesson from the level of debate and the tone of surprise these estimates caused on his blog. Photography is not a transparent business. In many cases the professionals in photography can't accurately assess the value of their work to the market.
There are good reasons for this. It's hard to quantify the value of creative thought. Each creator has a different business realities and costs of production to consider in pricing. That said, not honestly and openly discussing pricing has in my opinion been a problem for our market.
Economists, particularly western ones, hate opaque markets. They are inefficient, volatile, and have higher costs then transparent ones. The web in many ways has made the market much more transparent. For example, it's super easy to find out how much everyone else is paying for a car. This protects buyer A from paying more then buyer B. This in turn helps legitimize the value of the vehicle.
Another problem with opaque markets is they allow the more informed player (in our case the client) to control the negotiation. A transparent market is one where all parties have equal access to information. If you knew what Sterling Cooper paid for their last 10 photo shoots you would be in a stronger negotiating position with them and with their competitors. In the current photography market a client can tell you - we never pay for that, every photographer signs this contract, the other guy is bidding 1/2 of what you bid - all you can do is guess what the other guy actually does or did. The more you know about the market the more accurately you can value your goods and services. Let's be clear transparency is not price fixing - which is illegal. In fact the more knowledge everyone has in a free market the fairer it tends to be.
Do give these estimates a careful read. For a definition of transparency here is the Economist's A-Z.
-Michael
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Michael Garlington
When I had no money to spend on such things (that's still true) I dropped a whopping $200 on Michael Garlington's book "Portraits from the Belly of the Whale." I'm still thrilled with my purchase which included a beautiful print called "The Fishmonger's Daughter." Seen here.
I knew right away that Garlington was a true artist. For one his images are imaginative and beautiful. Think Christopher Walkin's adventures in Wonderland. What really tipped me off is I met Garlington in San Francisco traffic. He was driving a VW bus which was wallpapered with his work prints. I pulled up next to him thinking what nonsense is this, then I saw that the images were brilliant. Here is Garlington's bio from the Gallery 291 website:
Michael Garlington is an acclaimed Northern California photographer and master printer. He began shooting his own images while working at Spindler Photography, a high-end lab in San Francisco that caters to the finest photographers working today. His work has been purchased by Yale, Dartmouth and countless private collectors.They should just show a picture of his van - it tells the story more fully.
If you are in SF, see his work at Gallery 291 starting September 10, 2009.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Beijing Street series
A few months ago we had the time and opportunity to visit our cousin Andrey in
It’s hard as an American not to have wildly inaccurate preconceptions about progress change in
The result of all the new building (they’ve had the best architects in the world working overtime) and the rapid cultural and economic development is a duality between new and old that seems present in every aspect of life. This uneasy and very rapid mix of the new into a very old place manifests itself physically in the streets and buildings, culturally in the art, politics and clothes and psychologically in the outlook of young and older generations
Heading to
The other critical element for this shoot was the ‘fixer’ Lin Jing. We really got lucky finding her. She was amazing. Her tireless energy and willingness to approach strangers on our behalf really made the shoot work. I ended up finding her through my old college friend Kay Chin Tay in
Well the work is finally online here: winokurphotography.com I hope you will take a look. One last step for us, sending prints to everyone we photographed. As always a BIG big up to my crew on this project: Iana Simeonov, Lin Jing and Chrysta Geffin.
-Michael